this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2026
701 points (97.3% liked)

memes

22517 readers
2252 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Why would you do this to us?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] otter@lemmy.ca 75 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (35 children)

Unfortunately some of the stuff that allows fingerprinting falls into a convenience vs privacy argument. It allows a website / web app to make changes to display things more appropriately, or have helpful functionality. That's why when you use a browser that is very strict about fingerprinting, some stuff will break.

An even simpler example is the screen aspect ratio. On a small screen, you want to use as much of the space as you can, but that information can be used for fingerprinting. This was annoying on browsers like mullvad, before they updated the aspect ratio to something more modern.

That doesn't excuse companies that abuse that data for malicious fingerprinting.

[–] Zarobi@aussie.zone -1 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Yeah exactly. A lot of features are like, let's design the website to perfectly suit your device. But then that means they know everything about your device, otherwise they can't design for it. Then, if they know everything about your device, bad actors will abuse that information. So the only solution is going back to shit websites, but nobody wants that, so we just kind of pretend that it's not a problem and compromise as best we can

[–] Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Don't speak for the lot of us.

I want to go back to websites that were actually just functional websites that did the thing they were designed to do and nothing more.

[–] Zarobi@aussie.zone 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Most people don't actually want that unfortunately. I agree with you but the numbers don't lie. People love bloated and annoying websites

[–] AstralPath@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Are you sure? Because I'd bet that people don't think about it enough to say they love it or hate it. Most people don't understand that the internet doesn't have to be this way. Its our job to enlighten them to that, I think.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@feddit.org 1 points 1 month ago

i agree with everything besides "it's our job to ..."

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (31 replies)