this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2026
558 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

87627 readers
4166 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zarobi@aussie.zone 63 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (17 children)

the API endpoint GET [redacted] will return user data for any account - not just your own account - so long as you supply a valid, five-digit user ID. It doesn’t perform any authorization check or ownership validation. “Just increment the number and get someone else's data,” she wrote.

This data includes users’ email addresses, first and last names, country, dates of birth, and whether the account has been deleted, and the API exposes all 719,517 accounts on the prayer site. “With sequential user IDs and no rate limiting, an attacker could enumerate every single account on the platform,” the hacker explained. “One GET request per user. for i in range(1, 719518): scrape(). That's it. That's the exploit.”

My God, that's horrific. Plus it doesn't even delete your data if you delete your account, it's still vulnerable.

[–] themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 month ago (3 children)

It sill works, you get first name and last name.

[–] Zarobi@aussie.zone 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Maybe I should remove that from my comment lol, I feel like I'm contributing to a data breach or something

[–] themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It is in the article doesn't matter if you remove it. The moment the article became public it is already too late.

[–] Zarobi@aussie.zone 1 points 1 month ago

I know, but a lot of people don't click the article, they just look at headline + comments, so it's still a reduction of visibility or an extra step. My comment is like exposing the endpoint right there front and centre. Plus, I don't like being personally responsible for any data breach. Maybe it's just a tiny thing but it felt like the right thing to do

load more comments (13 replies)