this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2026
796 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

87627 readers
4166 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 203 points 1 month ago (34 children)

Couldn't happen to an uglier, more stupid car.

It looks like something a 6 year old designed on a 1980s PC.

[–] cadekat@pawb.social 56 points 1 month ago (9 children)

When the cybertruck was first announced, I actually appreciated how different it looked, but its performance and association to Musk has entirely ruined any hope of me ever liking a low-poly vehicle ever again.

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I know this sounds really pathetic to say out loud now that it's a confirmed flop, but I never liked the look.

[–] Flower@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

I didn't really care about the look. Then I saw one in the flesh in a car show. The thing just looked strange up close. It was cordoned off too unlike the hundreds of other cars there. I guess they didn't want people touching it because lots of greasy fingers and stainless steel body don't mix well.

[–] davepleasebehave@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

it never had the makings of a varsity athlete

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (30 replies)