this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2026
334 points (89.8% liked)

Technology

87627 readers
3732 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] db2@lemmy.world 36 points 1 month ago (14 children)

This doesn't hit these sociopaths, the whole stock market system is rigged so they make paper profits no matter what happens, at the expense of others who aren't in the Epstein class. A pump and dump like this is just a little faster.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 22 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (11 children)

In the same vein, this is partly why I’ve never understood the mindset of individual investors. Like, it’s extremely arrogant to seriously believe that you have an edge over highly resourced institutions and billionaire investors who can afford the best analysts and mathematical models on top of their market influence. I can assure you that whatever strategy you have, theirs is better, and they don’t have to play by the same rules. What can you hope to bring to the table when you’re swimming with these sharks?

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (4 children)

who can afford the best analysts and mathematical models on top of their market influence.

Why bother with that when you can just do a little inside trading during the next child raping party?

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

That’s exactly what I’m saying. Any edge that I have as an individual isn’t relevant against these people. They have far superior information. I don’t have a chance.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

yeap, you are 100% correct

Plus, it's not anecdotal AND goes beyond your statement.

Through the years and statistical analysis, it has been proven that picking stock, even by professionals is still mostly luck. I think analysts have ran out of ridiculous examples of animals picking stock randomly and still coming on top in a long enough time period.

So if even the "professionals" are not really doing much, why would any individual nurture the thought that THEY could do better?

https://unwall.app/www.forbes.com/sites/rickferri/2012/12/20/any-monkey-can-beat-the-market/

https://www.npr.org/sections/money/2013/01/14/169326326/housecat-beats-investors-in-stock-market-challenge

https://acquirersmultiple.com/2018/04/daniel-kahneman-the-illusion-of-stock-picking-skill/

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

So if even the "professionals" are not really doing much, why would any individual nurture the thought that THEY could do better?

Because they think the luck factor gives them a chance. they are gambling addicts.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)