this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2026
457 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

87649 readers
3291 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 37 points 1 month ago (18 children)

7. You must not share projects that mostly consist of code written by "generative AI"-tools (including services such as Claude, OpenAI Codex). Such projects having an unclear copyright status (see requirements § 2 (1) 1 and § 2 (1) 3) and furthermore have little safeguards to ensure that they do not include harmful code (c.f. § 2 (1) 5).

That feels like a reasonable middle ground. Allow some things with some AI written code, but don't allow stuff that is a majority of AI code.

[–] Kaligalis@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Let's be real here: Most future projects will be mostly written by AI.
Sure, the good ones will have proper human QA. But Claude Code is so much faster at writing and rewriting surprisingly good code, that ignoring it is just like ignoring IDEs was a decade ago.
You can still write code without AI, syntax highlighting, code-suggestions, documentation tooltips, inspections, and fully integrated version control. But all these tools legitimately make software development easier.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 7 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Let's be real here, the concerns about what the copyright is of code that's produced by AI is still sort of in the air, especially for a site that wants to host content from across the globe. Codeberg picking its battles and not wanting to deal with that for now seems reasonable.

[–] cloudskater@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Let's be real here, the ethical concerns over LLM use far outweigh any copyright concerns and are the real reason people should refrain from using them in any way, shape, or form.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah like whether it's stolen or not. Whether it's a copyright violation. Oh wait.

[–] cloudskater@piefed.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 month ago

Was that a comeback? I think we're agreeing with each other here. It does matter if stuff is stolen, which all LLM generated stuff is. I was referring more to the environmental impacts and all, because I'm sick of ppl talking about copyright as if that's what makes LLMs suck. Even if it was legal under copyright law, it'd still be awful on all fronts.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)