554
Flock Said Its Cameras Don't Track People. Then a Reporter Proved Them Wrong On Video
(www.gadgetreview.com)
this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2026
554 points (99.5% liked)
Technology
87627 readers
4456 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It's a patriotic act defending the 4th amendment to destroy those cameras.. it's in the freaking constitution.
Not sure public video recording amounts to a search and seizure. Is there case precedent establishing specifically that?
Yeah why didn't those 18th century slave owners specifically mention public video recording?