this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2026
543 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

87515 readers
2851 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] toothbrush@lemmy.blahaj.zone 45 points 1 month ago (5 children)

The amended EP position adopts a positive, yet rather cosmetic amendment proposed by the liberal RENEW group that would “exclude communications to which end-to-end encryption is, has been, or will be applied” from the scope of the law.

This isnt cosmetic, this is genius! It satisfies lawmakers who want to make this pass to "save the children" and have no idea of the consequences, and it satisfies the lawmakers with braincells since makes the law inapplicable to secure communications.

I hope this does pass so they finally stop trying to push it through. But since they did pass the voluntary one but are still trying to pass the non-voluntary one, I think they will just try to spam chat control laws until their dystopic aim is achieved.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah. It might be preferable to draw a line between social media and chat applications.

That way the people who are scared can teach their children to talk on services that are scanned, while people that care for their privacy can opt for private communication.

If it's about pedophiles sharing stuff with each other, they'll never be able to stop that.

[–] ClownStatue@piefed.social 1 points 1 month ago

If it's about pedophiles sharing stuff with each other, they'll never be able to stop that.

I mean they can’t stop it entirely, but the could do some things… Like invest in mental healthcare to understand and combat such social problems, but just passing laws is so much easier.

load more comments (3 replies)