this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2026
94 points (80.9% liked)

memes

22478 readers
3979 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 month ago (8 children)

Lower birthrates are less an issue that people think.

For any living being self replication can explode incredibly fast, and it's usually the case when numbers dwindle, due more resources available per person.

Big birth numbers are more worrying and limited resources lead to fast "too little resources for everyone" situation.

I remember reading that part of what took Europe our of the dark ages after the black plague was that survivors thrived in an post plague environment. Also remember reading that dutch population growth actually taller because after so many people died survivors got more meat and food in general available to them, so their children grew a lot.

So in general I'm always more worry about high birthrates than low birthrates.

[–] Fleur_@aussie.zone 7 points 1 month ago (6 children)

The problem is we have retirement these days. And also the plague would've killed the old and frail leaving the young and capable behind. Whilst birthrate decline means there are less young people relative to old people. This burdens young people who have to take care of the old. A problem that didn't exist when all of the old people died.

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

I suppose the worst case scenario is old people having to work because they cannot retire as soon.

They are already saying it that new retirement ages would be in the 70s

Not ideal, but far better than starving or being homeless because you don't have resources for so many people.

[–] Fleur_@aussie.zone 1 points 1 month ago

Not sure if I should be sad that I'll never be able to retire or happy because I never have to save for retirement

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)