this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2026
807 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

87550 readers
3177 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] carrylex@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Wikipedia - is as always - doing a great job at gathering info and they wrote down what the party's policies are.

IMHO what they propose makes no sense:

  • (Massively) cut taxes
  • Reimmigration
  • Reduce the normal work week by 25%

How is that economy supposed to work? Where do you get the money from to finance this? Who should offset the missing work?

A $500k donation can bankroll your party for some time but certainly not an entire country...

Energy & Fuel policy

In 2025 the leader of the Örebro Party, Markus Allard, in a post on X wrote that he wished to see a complete elimination of taxes on energy & fuel.[48] Allard once again said that this was a priority for the Örebro Party in an X-post in 2026.[49] As taxes on energy and fuel make up 40 to 50% of the price in Sweden, abolishing them would lead to the prices being significantly decreased.

Again, never a path of substance to make this happen. This is how this spreads. It always sounds great in quips but no actual policy substance to get it across the line.

load more comments (4 replies)