this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2026
807 points (98.6% liked)
Technology
87550 readers
3247 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
You can not like it and you can run away from mullvad that's a fine thing to be motivated to do hut what the other cofounder said is true. We don't win by being tribal and team based. We when by tolerating and coexisting. I don't know how this "Nazi" had harmed people but giving money to a political party is only a part of the story. If no one cares to hear the other side you are just perpetuating the same hate.
Never heard of the tolerance paradox have you?
The way to resolve the tolerance paradox is to not tolerate intolerance.
"Donating money to" and "bankrolling the entire party, 10x-ing their entire funding in 2024 alone" are different things.
There are SO many people here who would happily dine with actual fascists just because they "make a good product." Completely ignoring what their funds that support them go to and lead to direct harm.
And if you think I'm hyperbolic, please, tell me how this is an incorrect line of thinking: https://lemmy.zip/comment/27359847
Except everyone thinks this applies to them. Baking gay wedding cakes is a good example because is forcing religious people to do it not tolerating their intolerance or is it being intolerant of their religion.
That's a terrible example. No one, individual or government, is forcing anyone to do anything of the sort.
It is entirely within the right of the business owner to decline a request to bake a cake they don't want to bake.
Can there be social repercussions for said action? Of course. Do people have the autonomy to decide not to give a business their money for whatever reason? Absolutely.
I wouldn't give them my money because, I'm sorry, if your "religion" is based on oppression and denial of other humans their basic rights, then no, I won't support you. Fuck off.
(Ironic as I know this incident and it's based on Christian religiosity, which following the actual teachings of Jesus would welcome the stranger, the wanderer, the sick, and the hungry. Regardless of whether they believe or not, they are all God's children. Given that Lucifer has no power of creation, only trickery, and God created all of his children, would that not imply Chrisitians should be accepting of Gods children in all their myriad forms, and to hate another is to fall for the trickery of Satan? That's not religion, that's just rationalizing bigotry. So double fuck off.)
It’s actually illegal in the US to discriminate against certain customers at a place of public accommodation. The famous gay cake case that went to the Supreme Court ultimately went in favor of the baker, but on very narrow procedural grounds that his religion had been targeted in the case. In the opinion, the court affirmed states rights to make anti-discrimination laws generally.
I still don’t think anti-discrimination laws are the government forcing anyone to bake a cake. They’re saying if you want to bake cakes, you need to be prepared to serve everybody. No one is forcing them to open a bakery.