this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2026
432 points (99.8% liked)

memes

22472 readers
3985 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] carrylex@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (6 children)

all power plants along the rhine river leaked thousands of tobs of irradiated water into the environment, same goes for those at the neckar. those are the ones i know for a fact.

Do you actually have proof/a source for that?

[–] Twongo@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago (5 children)
[–] carrylex@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (4 children)

That is a map of reactors in europe. What has that to do with your claim?

[–] Chaf@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 month ago

You have to do a bit more than just open the website and immediately dismiss it. Granted, it's in German, but clicking on the individual reactors gives you a list of incidents there.

If you want something more condensed, here is a list of incidents in

Germany https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liste_meldepflichtiger_Ereignisse_in_deutschen_kerntechnischen_Anlagen

or Europe https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liste_von_St%C3%B6rf%C3%A4llen_in_europ%C3%A4ischen_kerntechnischen_Anlagen

though also only available in German. Just because an incident does not make it to the news, does not mean that no radiation was leaked.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)