this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2026
186 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

87627 readers
4114 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 73 points 15 hours ago (24 children)

If Streamers were smart, they'd lock pricing and change it for new signups.

Their problem is numbers retention. People would hesitate to cancel if their $8 plan would have to be 15/month or more to restart.

Moving everyone up, just pushes people to cancel, and they'll be even more unlikely to come back if prices keep going up

[–] dudeface@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (2 children)

That sounds like terrible economics when you have hundreds of millions of customers who will likely just accept it

[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 7 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

The cost in electronic services is in acquisition; the nominal cost to deliver services to a paying subscriber is lower than acquiring a new one.

Yes you would flatten your margin with existing customers by not hiking their rates (or not as much) but pretending there won't be defection assumes near monopoly--which the US has permitted largely for the last 4 decades.

Cell phone companies made it super easy to leave by only offering good discounts to new customers.

[–] dudeface@lemmy.world -1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Netflix are saturated, let’s not pretend they need new subscribers

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 9 points 15 hours ago

Jesus....

This is a couple years old but:

Shares of Netflix closed down more than 35% Wednesday after the streamer reported earnings Tuesday evening that showed it lost subscribers for the first time in more than 10 years.

https://www.cnbc.com/2022/04/20/netflix-plunges-trading-subscriber-loss.html

The product is the stock price.

Amount of subscribers effects stock price.

They raise price as a reaction to not meeting aubscriber goals.

Which is a short term fix that needs to be done over and over again.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 6 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

Then you don't understand why long term reliable customers are better than intermittent ones...

Which means you don't know anything else about business, and are just going off vibes

[–] plyth@feddit.org 1 points 7 hours ago

Then you don’t understand why long term reliable customers are better than intermittent ones…

It's a numbers game. Are there so many? Why else would a company care?

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago

I'm sure they tested it and found that enough customers would stay to make it profitable.

Consumers, especially Apple users, accept higher prices. It's baffling to me but true.

In 2014, Netflix was $8/month. It's now 12 years later and Netflix is $20/month.

[–] dudeface@lemmy.world -2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

You said basically nothing that counters anything I said

Enjoy getting back to high school

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Upvote because you are right. Doenvote for the unnecessary insult.

[–] dudeface@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

Downvote more then

load more comments (21 replies)