this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2026
298 points (93.8% liked)

memes

22472 readers
3768 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Maybe gay if you're only into enbies?

[–] Carnelian@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I’ve considered that, and I agree in theory, but is that something that occurs on the level of sexual attraction?

In practice I feel like it’s a romantic quality, i.e. “since we are both non-binary, I feel we understand each other and I feel especially safe with you, and in fact this type of relationship is the only one I would want”,

I suppose in this manner you could easily be a gay demisexual enbie, but I wonder of the larger cohort of people who experience a more immediate sexual attraction

Again, not that it’s important to have this all ironed out neatly. I just feel like it hasn’t been ironed out neatly, you know?

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

That sounds closer to a non orientation based preference. Similar to people I know who only or preferentially date other trans people despite also being attracted to cis people aligned with their orientation. For many of them it's about not being comfortable displaying the level of vulnerability inherent to romance to someone who can't fully understand that aspect of them or who has that specific privilege over them.

The way I'd personally frame it is probably saying that you're enby4enby, just taking from the T4T terminology

[–] Carnelian@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hey thank you so much for responding! I really like this concept in the language of non-orientation based preferences colliding with traditional descriptions.

This is my first time ever seeing E4E considered, and you’re kind of blowing my mind! I think it works really well

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Glad to be of help!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)