this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2026
994 points (99.3% liked)
Technology
87575 readers
3604 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
destroying (A) physical copy. in order to copy the (1) copy of a book(which most new already exist as pdf). kinda like how people do it when they scan the book. which has been happening for decades now to make knowledge permanent.
far cry from "destroying all books" which these rage bait titles suggest. we arent standing around a pit of fire.
bigger tragedy is how humans seem shittier at communication as AI learns. probably a more accurate title.
There are many, many non destructive scanning methods. My understanding is that most archival projects are using the non destructive options.
The easy option is to just slice off the binding and run it through a scanner.
The easy option is what is being talked about here, and those books are then fed into AI as training material. The digital copies aren’t “making knowledge permanent” as they are tucked away into a digital corner virtually no one has access to. They are as permanent as the source code for Fortnite.
If a PDF already exists, as you claim, then why go to the trouble of obtaining, destroying and scanning the books again?
There's also Kobo... Kindle... epubs..
Not just pdfs.
Heck you can get audio books. Most books are now sold with recording.
This has been happening for decades.
Are all you people complaining here just not book readers and just here for pure out rage?
Ok? That doesn’t answer my question, if anything it makes it more obvious how you are incorrect:
If a [insert digital format name] already exists, as you claim, then why go to the trouble of obtaining, destroying, and scanning the books again?
Your response reads like there are more options than just PDF, so it’s fine to destroy the books.
They bought a copy of a book. They gonna do with it what they want. It's their's. Not your's. Their's.
You didn't buy it. And you didn't care about it till now. Over something you didn't buy. Someone else did.
So now you are outraged they are making copies? This has been happening since copy machines were invented.
You're outraged they destroyed THE ONE COPY they bought? (NOT ALL. JUST ONE)
They recycled rather than hoarded. Good for them.
This happens every day since books and other things were invented to manage unwanted junk.
If you want it go buy a copy and support the author, go for it. You want to recycle? Go for it. Both things are not illegal. Nor should they be.
I don't get your problem here. Seems like you're too stupid to know what to outrage about.
It's like you discovered that dirt exists for the first time and how dare someone shovels dirt in some unmarked area you never even knew or cared existed to make a trench.