this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2026
207 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

87598 readers
3654 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] artyom@piefed.social 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

In a reply to a post on X, Elon Musk said the circumstances of the crash meant that FSD could not have been in use at the time. "Yes, this makes no sense. FSD drives slowly through neighborhood streets and this was a high speed crash!" he wrote.

I mean, in a world where FSD is infallible, that makes sense. But we know it's not. And he knows it's not.

Also "could not have been in use at the time" and "only drives slowly" are contradictory. Not sure if that's just an inaccurate paraphrasing of the post by the author.

[โ€“] dabaldeagul@feddit.nl 1 points 2 months ago

It couldn't've been in use, because if it had been in use, the vehicle's speed would've been lower. Is what Elon Musk is claiming.

load more comments (1 replies)