this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2026
302 points (91.5% liked)

Technology

87417 readers
3720 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 6 days ago (7 children)

Not them, but having read this entire thread, what contra points?

Other than that, I haven't seen much in this thread.

I see a few points of how Frances configuration for cooling may not be good, but that's not an unsolvable problem?

At least more solvable than the energy storage problem.

Physicist, not an engineer.

You need baseline and demand power.

Renewables like wind and solar are great for demand. As they provide power typically when usuage is peaking. But those power outputs drop when its needed most, so you still need baseline power.

Nuclear power is great at baseline, but because it takes a lot to ramp power up and down, isnt great to handle peak loads.

Notice the team up here?

Why is it always renewables or nuclear. Both have their places.

This solves the energy storage problems as well. Less of a need for batteries with rare earth metals that are.... Finite.

[–] Sniatch@feddit.org 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

Nuclear and renewables are not good together. You can't adjust the output of Nuclear to the up and downs of renewables. Nuclear is a lot more expensive than Renewables. So Nuclear have always to be running, which makes the price go up. You can't build more renewables to make the price go down if you have Nuclear running.

The cheapest way is to have renewables produce energy and store it in batteries.

[–] wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Out of what, large scale, battery is available?

I haven't seen one yet. Tons of prospects, none deployable on the size of say, the north american grid.

[–] Sniatch@feddit.org 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

For example the biggest Battery Storage in germany is happening this year https://www.diesachsen.de/en/economy/germanys-largest-battery-storage-facility-launches-near-leuna-3169138

And we will see more and more of projects like these in the next years.

Like even Texas is investing into Renewables + Battery Storage. Even they get it

https://www.cleanview.co/power-projects/operating/battery-storage-projects/texas

https://www.cleanview.co/power-projects/planned/battery-storage-projects/texas

load more comments (4 replies)