this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2026
585 points (97.1% liked)

Technology

87515 readers
2867 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 week ago (19 children)

Every time I hear of an all electric aircraft of any size, I always wonder what they're going to do about landing weight.

Every modern transport category jet has a higher takeoff weight than landing weight, because of the simple unavoidable fact that landings are rougher than takeoffs. Taking off, the load gradually comes off of the landing gear, on landing it's suddenly applied. Jets burn tons, literally tons, of fuel enroute, so they're considerably lighter on approach. It's why aircraft have dump valves to jettison fuel overboard in case of forced landing early in the flight.

Batteries don't get lighter as they're discharged, so...?

[–] yes_this_time@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

You can rethink the engineering with electric motors.

The planes you are describing are designed assuming they will be lighter on landing because of fuel. So why design them for take off weight?

Electric motors are condusive of blown wing design for example, and would have a unique landing profile. (The plane can land at much slower velocity)

Edit: yeah they've moved the engine shroud which allows for lower speeds. Given the same runway you would be able to trim vertical speed.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You can rethink the engineering with electric motors.

One of the other limitations is that you're stuck with propellers if you're using electric motors, so your top speed is going to be significantly slower than jets. Unless you do the Tu-95 thing with contra-rotating props whose tips exceed the speed of sound, and then you have monstrous noise problems.

[–] teuto@lemmy.teuto.icu 1 points 1 week ago

You can do ducted fans, which is what a turbofan minus the turbine is.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)