this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2026
585 points (97.1% liked)

Technology

87515 readers
2851 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 week ago (19 children)

Every time I hear of an all electric aircraft of any size, I always wonder what they're going to do about landing weight.

Every modern transport category jet has a higher takeoff weight than landing weight, because of the simple unavoidable fact that landings are rougher than takeoffs. Taking off, the load gradually comes off of the landing gear, on landing it's suddenly applied. Jets burn tons, literally tons, of fuel enroute, so they're considerably lighter on approach. It's why aircraft have dump valves to jettison fuel overboard in case of forced landing early in the flight.

Batteries don't get lighter as they're discharged, so...?

[–] teuto@lemmy.teuto.icu 8 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The same way we make bigger aircraft with higher landing weights: beefier landing gear and structural reinforcement. Airliners don't have a lower max landing weight than takeoff because they have to, they do it because it's cheaper and more efficient. Add some more structural weight and you lose some payload, but if the efficiency gains from fuel cost savings make it worthwhile, then manufacturers will make them.

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You'll hit a point where the payload is so poor it isn't worth operating.

[–] teuto@lemmy.teuto.icu 3 points 1 week ago

It's a bigger deal on bigger aircraft, but on mid-size narrow bodies it's not as much of a problem. A 737, depending on the model, only has a difference of about 20-30k lbs between MTOW and MLGW and no fuel dump capability. An overweight landing isn't really a big deal in one, just a quick maintenance inspection. Closing the gap so MTOW and MLGW are equal is doable. It's hard to overstate how huge of an expense fuel is to an airline, if they have to lose some passengers and cargo they would absolutely do it if it got rid of the fuel expense.

Of course all that is contingent on having batteries with enough energy density to get somewhere close to current MTOWs while having something of a useful range.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)