By being just a little weird, but in a pattern, and not to you. A pattern like: every n tokens raise the temperature (randomness) for one token. Then to dectect AI, you tokenize and calculate how expected each next token is. Then you try fitting the pattern to that.
TheBlackLounge
joined 11 months ago
Is it webscrapers?
Supposedly the people paid to rate responses are already using AI
LLM is fine to say, not more awkward than element. And it is AI.
And I wish we'd call phones computers. It's been very profitable for corps for people to not realize that they are.
Don't forget the AI bubble is also a ram and SSD bubble.
Not in a "Darwinian moment", like the CEO says. Then healthy social structures can be decisive.
Survival of the fittest is about species, not individuals. He's saying AI is a threat to the human race.
Except it is a fairly good artifice of grass.
Good for what? Looking at? It's not gonna satisfy a goat.
We only care for the look ("the output"), and we don't expect more of it, or sell it for more than it is. That's why it's not a controversial term for astroturf. It wasn't controversial for AI either until very recently. In 60 years of AI nobody has split hairs over output of intelligence. It's justified but weirdly misdirected anger.
AI is a perfectly cromulent word for the thing.
Do you question the grass part of artificial grass? It's obviously not grass.
Imho nothing wrong with AI use by professionals, as long as it's verified. That obviously wasn't the case.
view more: next ›
Lower temperature is not necessarily better quality. At 0 it will get very repetitive, it's for classification tasks, not for prose.
I suppose the optimal temperature depends on the model and the task, and I don't think it's very sensitive. Varying temp might even give better results, who knows.