If it's stuff that no one cares what you write, then they also won't care if it's proveably written by AI or not. So removing the watermark still does nothing beneficial.
CovertOperative
joined 2 months ago
Test what? Anthropic hasn't made a detection method available yet, and I think none of the free models have the watermarking yet, as they're all older than Aug 2.
Well in this case the website itself is preventing me from risking my privacy accessing it.
"We cannot allow you to protect your data."
the semantics are totally lost
Is there a place where we can do that test? The article links to a download, but it tells you which is which.
Grifters disagree with other grifters on how to grift.
Poorly phrased title. It's a nightmare BY Christian nationalists, not FOR them.
The US research enterprise too heavily centers on ~~people who know what the scientific method is~~ elite research institutions, and fails ~~idiots who do shit based on vibes~~ individual researchers with bold ideas, suggests the White House Office of Science and Technology in a new report.
AI bullshit company can't use sandbox environment: expected
So-called "security company" whose job literally is to install and test potential malware can't use sandbox environment: priceless.
The first time I heard about this was from this article: https://www.srf.ch/kultur/gesellschaft-religion/jagd-auf-alte-buecher-ki-firmen-kaufen-antiquariate-leer-und-vernichten-die-buecher
A translated quote from it:
"Not rarities, but the exact opposite," the dealer reports: “What specifically was bought were nonfiction titles from 1970 onward with ISBN numbers—dusty, unsold stock that no one had wanted for years. Resale is completely out of the question: The books are worthless, and for each title only exactly one copy was purchased.”
That article still tries to frame this as "Rare antique books are going to be lost forever".
view more: next ›
Grokipedoa is probably just grok itself.