AHemlocksLie

More accurately, if you claim you used Claude, I will assume absolutely anything produced with it has a high chance of being rife with errors. If you provided citations for every last detail and then said Claude put it together, I wouldn't trust it until I've personally verified the sources because not only will it hallucinate details, it'll hallucinate sources. Anything produced with it is inherently untrustworthy.

Yeah, but the only source explicitly provided in this hypothetical is the hallucination machine.

Because we don't see all that research, we just see a comment where you said you asked the hallucination machine, so now, if I want to use anything you said, I have to go duplicate all that research before I can trust it.

Original comment was lamenting inability to record at 4k 60 FPS, but I thought they wanted to view 4k on the phone, like with a 4k display. If I remember right, the detail would be too fine to really matter on a phone screen, but if you're recording instead, you can obviously just watch on something else and I sound like an idiot.

Nobody asked you? Why do we care what you think?

Nobody asked you in particular, either, but here we are like 3-4 replies deep anyway. Even if we had, you've refused to answer so you can act like a smug cunt instead, so you'd apparently be useless at it anyway.

Sounds to me like you're insecure and looking for a free handout instead of being able to come up with a coherent reason for why you're owed something you've not earned.

My guy, then just shut the fuck up. You don't have to use it as an opportunity to grandstand and fellate yourself for being so smart to get it. You could just say nothing if you don't want to actually contribute. Honestly, you've been worse than useless here.

I misread, my bad, thought they were talking about viewing, not recording.

Oh, I misread, my bad, I thought it was about viewing 4k, not recording.

You're spending more effort to be a smug prick than it would take to just rattle off an example or three. Sounds more to me like you don't know what the fuck you're talking about and just want to publicly stroke your... Ego.

It's impossible to say for sure from what they said. Depends on how it accumulated and how the housing prices have evolved in their area. Could be linear, could be exponential.

I'm not opposed to people paying their taxes, they definitely should, but I do think it's kind of a dick move to take the whole house if they don't pay the taxes. At least, for a relatively modest home owned by its primary resident who has no other home. For landlords and property speculators, though, 100% keep the property tax and use it to keep them from taking too much housing. Same for second homes, if you can afford two, you can afford taxes on one. I just don't think we should ever tax someone into literal homelessness.

I think you don't own it so much as you lease it for like 80 years, maybe 100. I don't remember specifics, though.